startlooki.blogg.se

1. #Aquamacs vs emacs how to#
2. #Aquamacs vs emacs for mac os#
3. #Aquamacs vs emacs manual#
4. #Aquamacs vs emacs code#

"Add argument to call to filladapt's fill-paragraph.

#Aquamacs vs emacs for mac os#

Download Aquamacs Emacs 3.6 for Mac OS 10. In XEmacs, development and maintenance of Lisp libraries is separated from the core editor development at a fairly low level. The Emacs for the Mac An Editor for Text, HTML, LaTeX, C++, Java, Python, R, Perl, Ruby, PHP, and more Aquamacs is a modern editor based on GNU Emacs.

#Aquamacs vs emacs code#

(defun wt/fix-filladapt-fill-paragraph (orig-fun &optional arg) The XEmacs source code is managed using Mercurial, whereas the GNU Emacs source code is managed using Bazaar.

In the meantime, here’s a little piece of function advice that works around the problem temporarily: Therefore, I propose that filladapt be removed from the Aquamacs distribution, or at least not load it by default. There’s some disagreement about which one is better, but that is now closer to a matter of taste than basic function. And there are packages out there now using it that way.Īlso, Emacs has also acquired a built-in Adaptive Fill mode. So now if you call (fill-paragraph), it works in standard Emacs, but not in Aquamacs. (fill-paragraph &optional justify region)

#Aquamacs vs emacs manual#

The manual for the most widely used variant, GNU Emacs, describes it as 'the extensible, customizable, self-documenting, real-time display editor'. Which was fine then, because it was very useful.īut in 2007, the signature of the standard Emacs fill-paragraph changed from Emacs / i m æ k s /, originally named EMACS (an acronym for 'Editor MACroS'), is a family of text editors that are characterized by their extensibility. Among other things, it redefines the standard Emacs fill-paragraph function.Ī long time ago, Aquamacs started including filladapt.el as the default (as far as I can tell, anyway). Diego Zamboni using Emacs since 1993, getting better at it Author has 72 answers and 171. If you are an Emacs purist, and want exactly the same interface everywhere, avoid Aquamacs. See the pages in CategoryDotEmacs for configuration suggestions and tips.Proposal: remove filladapt.el from the Aquamacs distribution:īack in the 90s Kyle Jones wrote filladapt.el for better and more flexible filling of paragraphs, especially in the programming modes. I find Aquamacs a really good Emacs for OS X. Start Emacs with a specific init file: emacs -q -l ~/my-init-file.elįor more information about init files and custom files (Emacs 22 or later): C-h r i init-file RET or M-: (info "(emacs) Init File") M-: (info "(emacs) Saving Customizations") M-: (info "(elisp) Init File") You can also have a separate CustomFile reserved strictly for customizations recorded by Customize.

#Aquamacs vs emacs how to#

Some of the init files posted on EmacsWiki are organized in this way, as a set of library files.įor info about how to load an EmacsLisp file automatically when you start Emacs, see InstallingPackages. It’s often better to break up a lengthy init file into a number of EmacsLisp libraries and a small, top-level init file that loads those libraries, especially if you define commands and other functions. See DebugFileLoading for more troubleshooting tips. If it seems like your init file is not being read, type ‘C-h e’ to see if there is a chance there was a problem with it loading. Rather than restarting Emacs, you can use ‘M-x eval-buffer’ to evaluate everything, or ‘M-x eval-region’ to evaluate a part you select, or just ‘C-x C-e’ (command ‘eval-last-sexp’) to evaluate the Emacs Lisp expression immediately before your cursor. When you add Emacs Lisp code to your init file, it is not evaluated until you restart Emacs. Or if you do not have one and want to create it, then just open it for editing in Emacs: C-x C-f ~/.emacs.d/init.el RET If you do not know where your init file is located, you can check the variable user-init-file: M-x describe-variable RET user-init-file RET The oldest design elements were not designed for the uses we make of them today. (It is almost as old as the first Unix, which barely resembled the Unix of later decades.) It is much older than Linux, the kernel.